For all of the campaign bluster blaming big business for American economic woes, Obama is not and never has been an anti-corporate crusader. He is much more interested in results than retribution. Obama’s key economic appointments suggest his administration will pursue acumen over antagonism when it comes to the business sector. The designation of Daley as chief of staff says it all.
If Obama has proven anything, it is that he is an uber pragmatist who prefers practical solutions over dogmatic ties to political philosophy. While business may have taken solace in the mainstream Republican ideology, it will be surprised at how non-ideological Obama may prove to be. After all, he has shown a willingness to borrow from the best of conservative, liberal, progressive and libertarian thinking in the development of his own unique world view. His commitment to success will compel him to think and act far outside the constraints of predictable political dogma. His call to review anti-business regulations is the height of mid-stream correction.
Balancing Commerce and the Constitution
More than any other president before, save Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, Barack Obama is acutely aware of both the expanse and the limitations of government power. His facility with constitutional law may be unparalleled in American presidential history. As a constitutional scholar, Obama knows, or should know, the balance that must be struck between permissible government regulation of business, trade and commerce on the one hand, and the light touch of regulation on the other that fuels innovation and investment in the marketplace. Above all, he should appreciate the wide swath that the commerce clause of the constitution cuts through our lives and should direct his cabinet and his erstwhile Congressional cohorts to err on the side of less—not more—government regulation.
In the area of commercial marketing and advertising, for example, a string of successive Supreme Court decisions have struck down burdensome restrictions on commercial speech as impermissible under First Amendment jurisprudence. The president-elect should recognize that heavier regulation in that sector, alone, will mean less revenue for many, many industries.
Of course, as with any other administration, the business community will have its differences and spates with Obama. The healthcare law overhaul is a mixed blessing for business, but the principle remains anathema to the GOP. Reducing regulation remains the Republican mantra, especially following remembrances of Ronald Reagan's 100th birthday
Whatever the issues that will bring business and Obama face-to-face, I would bet that the president's goal every time will be to carve out a win-win scenario so the public good does not obstruct the gains of the private sector. Last but not least, all indications are that Barack will challenge big business—as he has challenged us all—to become its best; to live up to higher standards and ideals, and to contribute to society and humanity in a way that it has never done before. Such an outcome surely would profit our nation and the dividend would go directly to the bottom line.
(c) Adonis Hoffman 2011
No comments:
Post a Comment